Liberal MPs want party to ‘accommodate different views’ with free vote



Archer said allowing MPs to make up their own minds would be “the path of least resistance” and she hoped the party would learn lessons from the debate over same-sex marriage, which ended up being “harder than it really needed to be”.

Loading

Liberal MPs typically have a free vote on every piece of legislation and unlike Labor, are not kicked out of the party if they cross the floor. In practice, however, they rarely go against the party line and in the recent past were bound by a party room position opposing same-sex marriage until the national postal survey was held.

Archer – who has crossed the floor twice in the last year, in support of an integrity commission and censuring Scott Morrison – noted the referendum was not going to be ultimately decided by politicians.

“I’m supportive of the Voice. At the end of the day Australians are going to decide, so should we stand in the way of that?”

“For something like the Voice … it shouldn’t be a matter of there’s more people in the party room that think this way, so we should do that. There has to be a degree of compromise and consensus.

Archer pointed out Liberal Indigenous Australians spokesman Julian Leeser had “made public statements in support of an Indigenous Voice” and would be left in an invidious position if the party room decided to formally oppose it.

“Knowing that and making him the shadow minister for Indigenous Affairs, what on earth would you be thinking of doing to him if you went ‘actually nah, we’re not gonna swing in behind this’, or at the very least [let MPs] express their own views? I think that would be a pretty unfair position to put Julian in.”

Several Liberal MPs who support the Voice, who asked not to be named, have said in recent weeks they think the best-case scenario for the party’s position on the Voice would be freedom of choice and for Dutton to personally support the proposal.

Liberal MPs Tony Pasin, Phillip Thompson and Claire Chandler have all spoken out to oppose the proposed Voice to parliament, citing a lack of detail.

Leeser has to date been tactically quiet about what the party’s position on the Voice is likely to be, but has outlined seven questions the Labor government needs to answer on the issue.

Loading

Those questions include who will be a member of the Voice, will members be elected or chosen, what powers the body would have, how will it make a difference to people’s lives, how will it represent diverse communities and whether regional and local bodies will also exist.

The Voice to parliament was proposed in the 2017 Uluru Statement from the Heart and would provide advice on laws and policies that affect Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders.

Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis from Jacqueline Maley. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter here.



Source link

Denial of responsibility! galaxyconcerns is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.