Former OPSEU official cites ‘clean’ record


One of three former senior union leaders facing a $6 million-plus lawsuit launched by OPSEU says the suit makes “outrageous and unfounded” allegations against him despite his more than 14 years of service.

In his statement of defence, filed with Ontario’s Superior Court of Justice, former administrator of financial services Maurice Gabay said he was a “loyal and hardworking employee throughout his approximately 14.5 years of service to OPSEU,” the Ontario Public Service Employees’ Union.

“Gabay had a clean disciplinary record, and was never advised of any concerns or allegations by OPSEU against him” until the lawsuit was launched and “long after his employment was terminated on a without cause basis,” his statement of defence states.

The OPSEU lawsuit, launched in January, alleges that Gabay, longtime president Warren “Smokey” Thomas and former first vice-president/treasurer Eduardo Almeida withdrew a total of $670,000 in cash from a strike fund without explanation, received “significant compensation” on top of their salaries, and had union-purchased cars transferred to themselves and family members.

In addition, “significant expenses” were charged to union credit cards without receipts, the union’s statement of claim says.

OPSEU is seeking “recovery of funds and assets unlawfully transferred” in the amount of $1.75 million from Thomas, $3 million from Almeida and $1 million from Gabay, as well as damages of $6 million for “breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, conspiracy, conversion and/or unjust enrichment (less any amounts recovered),” the statement of claim says.

In its statement of claim, the union says financial irregularities came to light in a forensic audit.

None of the allegations has been proven in court.

Current OPSEU president JP Hornick has assured members that, despite the financial misconduct raised in the lawsuit, “our union remains strong and our finances stable.”

Gabay’s statement of defence says “it was a long-standing practice at OPSEU to withdraw funds in cash from the strike fund” and that all transactions were authorized by Thomas or Almeida.

“Gabay denies making or authorizing any inappropriate withdrawals, and denies receiving any amounts from the strike fund for his own benefit,” the statement of defence says, and nor did he try to delay the forensic audit, as alleged.

It also says his employment was terminated by OPSEU without cause.

“Gabay denies that he engaged in any misconduct, including any serious misconduct, as alleged by OPSEU,” his statement of defence states. “Gabay denies that he received any payments, funds or compensation from OPSEU to which he was not entitled” and that “at all material times, he acted in accordance with the policies, procedures, and/or practices established by Thomas and Almeida, and/or the instructions” given to him by the pair.

Gabay has launched a counterclaim, seeking $750,000 in damages given how OPSEU has treated him, making “outrageous and unfounded allegations” against him and publicizing them, saying it was “designed to inflict, and did inflict, mental distress.”

Earlier this month, Thomas filed his statement of defence, saying the lawsuit launched by the new leaders of the union he headed for almost 15 years was politically motivated and began after he appeared alongside Premier Doug Ford in support of the government’s move to boost the minimum wage.

The lawsuit “culminates a long campaign by Mr. Thomas’ political rivals … to demean, politically destroy, and cause irreparable emotional and reputational harm to him and his associates. It has no basis in reality, and is entirely manufactured.”

Thomas has launched a $5.5 million counterclaim.

OPSEU has launched a second, $24 million lawsuit that includes further allegations against Almeida and Gabay in relation to at least 15 individuals or businesses they had undeclared ties to, accusing them of payments for bogus or unfinished work as well as kickbacks.

Those allegations have also not been proved in court.

JOIN THE CONVERSATION

Conversations are opinions of our readers and are subject to the Code of Conduct. The Star
does not endorse these opinions.



Source link

Denial of responsibility! galaxyconcerns is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave A Reply

Your email address will not be published.