Church tensions ignite over stances

“Ultimately, this is a moral question for the church – it is not a legal question,” he said.

“A number of bishops I know have been confronted directly about what I call equivocation.”

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese joined Uniting Church leaders in Sydney on Sunday for a service and the launch of the church’s Yes campaign, where he promised to set up a joint parliamentary committee, with co-chairs from Labor and the Coalition, to oversee the law to set up the Voice if the majority vote Yes on October 14.

One of the Uniting Church ministers at the event, Simon Hansford, said the case for Christians to vote Yes was based on Christian teachings about supporting those on the margins of society who need care.

“In terms of Australia, it’s quite clear that our First Nations people are the ones who are most, as a group, marginalised and pushed to the edges and traditionally and historically ignored,” he said.

“What people of faith would want to say is that where we would find Jesus is most likely to be with those who are most in need.”

Loading

Asked for his argument for a Yes vote from a person of no faith, Hansford said: “If you want to shift the world in which you live, do you find yourself shifting the community by punishing or neglecting or by ignoring, or do you find it by creating and offering hope?” He said a Yes vote was the response that offered hope.

A public letter supporting the Voice was signed in February by the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, the Anglican Church, the Australian Catholic Bishops Conference, the Australian Sangha Association, the Hindu Council, the National Sikh Council of Australia, the Uniting Church Assembly and the Australian National Imams Council.

The Australian Christian Lobby has not taken a position on the issue.

While the Voice has support from Anglican leaders, one rector said the “view from the pew” was against the Voice or wary of the change.

“I think the bishops will find that they have been singing in their own bathroom on this one,” said Father Peter Macleod-Miller, the rector of St Matthews Anglican Church in Albury.

“The day after the referendum may be another unwelcome epiphany for some of them.”

About 44 per cent of Australians identify as Christian and another 10 per cent say they hold another faith, highlighting the potential influence of faith leaders.

In a sign of the way some peak groups are speaking up as the vote nears, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry issued a public statement on September 5 to endorse the Voice after a vote by councillors, adding to earlier support for the Uluru Statement.

“There is a clear moral imperative for constitutional recognition of Australia’s First Nations,” said council president Jillian Segal.

Loading

Yes23 campaigner Shireen Morris, who helped co-ordinate the statement from faith leaders in February, said the most productive action was happening at the “grassroots”, and included public events to talk to voters.

“Sometimes it’s those at the top who are slow to act, probably because they get tied up in bureaucracy, or they worry about what some people will think,” she said.

“But with less than three weeks to go until the referendum, there is a moral imperative now for all to take action.

“I say to all Australians of faith, and all Australians of diverse backgrounds, feeling empathy for the plight of Indigenous peoples is not enough. Saying you’re supportive is not enough. You need to take action in solidarity with Indigenous people.”

Start the day with a summary of the day’s most important and interesting stories, analysis and insights. Sign up for our Morning Edition newsletter.