The Biden administration on Friday appealed a Texas federal judge’s decision to strike down free Obamacare coverage of preventive health-care services ranging from screenings for certain cancers and diabetes to HIV prevention drugs.
U.S. Judge Reed O’Connor of the U.S. Northern District Court of Texas on Thursday struck down an Obamacare mandate requiring most private insurance plans to cover certain types of health care recommended an independent panel of experts called the Preventive Services Task Force.
“Preventive care is an essential part of health care: it saves lives, saves families money, and improves our nation’s health,” said Kamara Jones, a Health and Human Services spokesperson, on Thursday evening after the judge’s ruling. “Actions that strip away this decade-old protection are backwards and wrong.”
The case will now go to U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. A majority of the judges on that court were appointed by Republican presidents.
HHS estimates that 150 million Americans benefited from the free screenings, counseling, medications and other forms of health care that prevent disease under the Obamacare requirements.
The judge’s ruling has created confusion about which preventive services are still covered and which are not due to the way the court order was written. But Lawrence Gostin, an expert on health law at Georgetown University, said the ruling clearly puts free coverage of the vast majority of preventive services listed below at risk.
Gostin said most private insurance plans will probably continue to cover these services but charge copays and deductibles. Working class Americans will get hit the hardest and might forgo essential health care because they can’t afford the cost, Gostin said.
O’Connor ruled that Obamacare cannot mandate free coverage of health care recommended by the Preventive Services Task Force because the organization’s members were appointed in an illegal manner. O’Connor tried to strike down Obamacare in its entirety in 2018, but the Supreme Court overruled him.
Two business owners and several individuals sued the U.S. in March 2020 over the preventive health services mandate, arguing that buying insurance that covers drugs that prevent HIV infection violates their Christian religious beliefs.
The plaintiffs claimed in their suit that the mandate to cover HIV prevention drugs “forces religious employers to provide coverage for drugs that facilitate and encourage homosexual behavior, prostitution, sexual promiscuity, and intravenous drug use.”
They also argued the Preventive Services Task Force was appointed in an unconstitutional manner and therefore its recommendations cannot serve as the basis of an Obamacare mandate.
Denial of responsibility! galaxyconcerns is an automatic aggregator around the global media. All the content are available free on Internet. We have just arranged it in one platform for educational purpose only. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials on our website, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.